After my last diatribe, I really shouldn't tackle another pet peeve, but I just can't resist. The pissiness, it knows no bounds.
When we read (and write) romance, we suspend reality a little bit and enter a universe where 30 something bachelors with abs of steel and hearts of gold lurk around every corner and where orphans outnumber happy childhoods 10 to 1. We enter a universe where 6'3" desk jockeys who never work out sit down for cheese burgers and shakes with gorgeous friends (whom they've spent 5 years taking for granted with sizzling sexual chemistry). It's Lake Wobegon meets Wisteria Lane: The men are well-endowed, the children are precious, and the women are sassy with eternally perky bits.
This kind of idealism is easy to digest because it's the life we'd like to live. No one worries about dishes and dust bunnies, and even the obnoxious neighbors have a good side. We read and write Romance to get to the HEA, and in Romance Land, divorce is backstory, not a future worry. I don't want reality to intrude on my HEA.
But, sometimes you HAVE to face reality or risk alienating your readers. It's a very fine line. We want bullet-proof heroes and multi-orgasmic heroines, but sometimes it's a bit like following a banana split with chocolate cake. Reality doesn't need to be THAT sweet.
Example 1: Erotic Thriller by one of my favorite authors. However, somehow Hero and Heroine end up doing the horizontal tango at least a DOZEN times in 24 hours. In this same span of time, they have: an investigation of an artifact, a ferry ride, not one, but two separate encounters with hit men, four changes of venue, two long car rides, surveillance work, and have three major arguments. Of course, each encounter appears to take hours and involves multiple high points. Which is, of course, the point of an erotic thriller, but after a certain point, I started getting weary for my poor heroine and wishing that Hero would go take a nap or call a hotline or something. Even when one of the focuses of the book is the physical relationship, one does not wish to fear that Hero suffers a psychological issue or perhaps a physical malady.
Example 2: One of my all-time favorite books by an author whose realism is often-spot on, but who also pushes the envelope during action scenes. Hero takes a bullet to the side of his stomach. He's bleeding profusely and needs pressure on the wound. However, this doesn't stop him from: formulating an attack strategy, running into a house, having an emotional reunion with his child, providing cover fire, running up three flights of stairs more than once while firing an automatic weapon, coming up with several on-the-fly plans, driving a car through a wall into a tree, taking an airbag to the wound, RUNNING back into the house, rescuing heroine from a burning building by climbing the three flights of stairs again, and then finally collapsing of his NEAR FATAL wound that requires extensive surgery and hospitalization. The kicker: a villain dies instantly of a similar wound.
Example 3: Writer known for her suspense and page-turning plots, but who often sends me into spasms of "No Freaking Way." Hero has: a brain concussion, a head wound requiring stitches, bruised ribs, ambiguous leg and back injury, broken ankle, frost bite, broken shoulder, bullet wound, and has recently run pell mell down a mountain. He manages to run back UP the mountain, past two gunmen to save heroine. Which an FBI chopper can't do. Oh, and there's like 6 feet of snow on the ground and it's below zero. Villain died of a single bullet wound. LOVED this book, but come on, give poor hero a chance at HEA that doesn't involve a disability check and a lifetime supply of perocet.
I know, I know, we want to push the envelope as writers. Wring every last drop of suspense out of a scene until the wallpaper is bloody and cowering. And even in lighter works, there's the Gilmore Girls phenomena whereby characters can consume massive amounts of junk food and caffeine and still look impossibly fabulous. But, in order to maintain the illusion that this could be US, that we can step into the characters shoes for an evening, we need to keep a tiny bit of reality present. (Unless, of course, you're writing fantasy, in which case you create the reality, and consistency is your only enemy. Lucky you. Go gloat now.)
What's your personal tolerance level for reality? The limits of your personal experience? The bounds of Ripley and Guinness? The bounds of TV and movies? Do you even care when the laws of medicine, physics, and anatomy are breached? How do you reality check yourself as a writer?
12 comments:
Wow! Are you sure those aren't books written about the new show on TV - Heroes? LOL
I'm not a good source to ask this question. The only thrillers I read are Alice's intrigues. (I started her latest during lulls in judging yesterday)
And the battered hero going on and on is funny because Lori sent me back some chapters of my WIP she's critiquing and my hero has bruised ribs. Every time he has an action, she's written "pain?". In other words, I'm not showing he's still hurting. I think we as writers do take some liberties in thinking our characters are stronger than they should be- or in my case, believing the reader knows the pain is insinuated without bopping them over the head with the issue.
Interesting blog, Wavy and I love your rants!
See, this is why I write fantasy, LOL! But seriously, the books you mentioned are over the top! Egad. I doubt I'd read beyond the first couple of chapters. Even in fantasy there's enough reality to help suspend disbelief, but the stories you describe sound more like comic books.
I've been lucky not to have read any of the kinds of books you mentioned, Wavy. Exaggeration is great in fiction, but there are limits. Thank heavens for critique partners, huh? 8^) They help us keep it real.
Wavy, I've never read any books like those. I prefer to wrap my imagination around reality and the possible, not the impossible.
You are definitely a great resource with your buyer beware tag lines.
Consider starting a reviewer column/business, 'Tag Your It'.
See, this goes into my, "Where the heck did I put the baby?" dilemma (also known as the "Oh, dear, I forgot he had broken ribs," "Don't forget there's a friggin dog out in the snow," and "Flu symptoms don't go away in twenty minutes nor do concussions"). Once you introduce a trait or a habit or an injury or a minor character, you have to remember it and it CAN BE A PAIN (This is my personal guess why most major characters don't wear glasses.)
When writing action scenes and subsequent chapters, I always kind of visualize Indiana Jones. Battered, bruised, broken, limping for awhile, bleeding, wincing, but still going on because he has to to save the day (or the girl or the Ark or whatever) while still exhibiting charm, wit and muscle, still human, still believable and still sexy as hell.)
I don't read as varied a plate as you (does anyone?) so I haven't run across these kinds of over the top behavior you describe, but it sounds as though I would get frustrated with them. I assume erotic thrillers are written mainly for women -- is it really any woman's fantasy to have sex 12 times in 24 hours? Maybe for 12 fantastic hours, but twelve times? Sounds like the mating habits of a billy goat and about as romantic. Maybe it's just me.
Your blogs are wonderful, every rant belongs in some publication, they are priceless. I don't read a lot of blogs -- okay, I mainly read this one and sometimes a friend's but it's hard to believe any writing group covers more diverse subjects in so many wonderful voices.
I'm just sayin'.
And Paty, how nice of you to mention you picked up Lawman. Thank you. Have you heard back from your editor?
FUN! FUN! FUN! blog, Wavy.
This reminds me of how I started out with the hero wearing a hat in Desert Guardian, and after a few chapters decided to ditch the hat. It was such a pain. Would his hat stay on if he did this? He took it off, where will he put it? Where did he leave it? I couldn't keep track so I wrote the hat out. But I find myself watching movies and tv shows with characters wearing hats and always wonder about the above.
Alice,
I haven't received the edits back, but she sent me something that makes me realize it isn't that I don't know but rather I was hasty in sending the ms to her.
In a future blog you will be hearing about a new organization. One that helps writers who are too impetuous.
Karen -- The Indiana Jones movies made a big deal about Indy's hat, using it in so many ways, having it come off during a struggle or a fall and then blow back onto the scene, his using his whip to get it at the last moment, etc... Acknowledging it a huge part of the character's identity even to the point of having the hat an integral part of the last scene in the last movie that let everyone know his life might have changed, but he hadn't. I loved hat they did with his hat.
I'm chuckling here. I read a fair amount of RS and I don't think I've EVER read any that over the top. Of course, there have been the heroes who get injured and plug on, but nothing as extreme as you listed, Wavy.
I pretty much write about every day people put in extraordinary circumstances, so most of my characters aren't highly trained Navy Seals who can take a beating and keep on ticking. I do think it's safe to assume some of these guys (extreme military, etc.) are trained to block out pain and can function at pain levels most people can't, but even they have limits.
Case in point...I posted a video on my blog about a DEA agent who (irresponsibly - I won't say accidentally) shot himself in the foot while speaking to a group of kids about gun safety. You may remember it on the news or web from last year. The instructor at my handgun class on Sunday showed it to us, and when I asked, "Why the heck is he still standing there talking when his foot is bleeding all over the place?" the instructor pointed out that some of these guys are trained to deal with the situation first and the pain second. This guy did eventually leave, and it's clear on his face he's hurting, so I do think it's likely some highly trained heroes could operate at extreme pain levels, just not likely for the everyday Joe Schmoe.
In STOLEN FURY a secondary character (detective) gets shot in the shoulder. Shoulder wounds can be tricky and he's already trying to recover from a taser when he's shot in the shoulder. Several times I've read the scene and thought, "Does this make him wimpy that he's not jumping up and saving the day, seeing as he's the only LE trained individual in the book?" Especially compared to heroes like you described, Wavy. But in the end, I left it the way it was written. This guy ends up being the hero in book three (the wip) and I've made a few references to his scar, but I don't think it's unreal or "wimpy" to point out that everyone has different limits. Hopefully he comes across as heroic rather than a wimp, but I guess only time (and reviewers!) will tell.
Fun blog. I love your rants. I definitely think you should be subbing these to the RWR.
Definitely a fun blog! I don't think I've ever read anything quite so over the top as you've described, Wavy. Sounds like some authors should just paint a big old "S" on their hero's chest and be done with it! :-)
A tangent regarding the hat issue. One of my favorite TV shows is still Due South. For those of you who don't remember or aren't familiar with it, it's the show about Benton Fraser, a Mountie who gets posted to the Canadian Consulate in Chicago and ends up solving crimes with a Chicago police detective. It became a running gag in the show that when Benton's hat stayed on, then he'd win the fight (or whatever he was doing), but if it came off, he'd lose.
I love that these are three NYT RS best-sellers and no one has read them :) I think the thing is, that it doesn't SEEM over the top when you're in the middle of a scene--it's only when the NEXT scene begins, that you're like, "Hey! Shouldn't he be dead now?" And when it's a best-selling author, perhaps people suspend disbelief a little more . . .
Thanks everyone for the compliments.
I'm thinking that perhaps reviewer is my dream job even more than NYT status. A large audience for my rants and plot dissections????? HEAVEN.
Alice, one of my favorite Indy scenes is where they fall through the awnings. Mythbusters tackled that scene a few years ago, and busted it to high heck. But, while you're watching it, it SEEMS plausible . . .
What a fun blog, Wavy! I haven't read these books either, but they definitely should have paid attention to Alice's "where's the baby" rule.
Alice's "where's the baby" rule really is one of the guidelines I use to double-check my work. In the edit stage, I go through my manuscripts multiple times, looking for just such slip-ups. And my characters definitely have more flaws than those in your examples. :)
What's my tolerance level as a reader? I'm not sure I have a hard-and-fast answer for that. It will depend on how much I've been drawn into the story, whether I'm invested in what happens to the characters, whether or not I've already stopped reading the book before I got to these scenes ...
Thanks for a fun blog!
Post a Comment