Monday, June 01, 2009

Writing software


Current Project: Leg Shaving Leads to Trouble
Status: Plugging away on first draft

For a couple of years now I've test-driven a few writing programs. Don't worry, I don't think these programs can write my book for me. If any of them say they'll help you plot your story, I immediately scratch it off of my to-try list. I've been on the hunt for a program that will help me keep thoughts in order and break up my writing a bit differently than the standard word processing program.

The need:
Don't get me wrong, I like Microsoft Word. I've always been happy with it, but as my manuscript is getting longer and more complicated (yay!) I'm getting more frustrated with the limitations of Word. I find it tedious to try and find my place when I want to jump to a random scene. It's frustrating to have to open several documents - one for the story, one for plotting, one for my characters, one for research, etc. Because if I put all that in one document, it bothers me having to jump around. Not to mention the never-ending scrolling. I also getting annoyed when I try to make a document map - basically an option in Word that let's you identify major sections. If you haven't used this feature before, imagine an outline that follows the following format:
1. Major point
a. subpoint
i. bullet of subpoint

The document map lets you make headers so you can do something like:
Chapter 1
Scene
Scene
Scene
Chapter 2
Scene
Scene

Then you can click on those headers to do to that part of the document. It's a rather helpful tool, but getting those headings in the proper format to appear in the document map can be frustrating. Especially if you want to keep your document in publishing standard formatting.

Although I'd been trying demos of programs off and on for a couple years, the search picked up this year because I wanted a program that would also help sort my academic writing. Fortunately, the search paid off.

The hunt:
I can't remember all of the program I've demo'd over past couple of years. Some of them seemed to have a couple features that were great, but other aspects weren't as helpful. Some are geared toward fiction writers, others toward screen writers, and a few are for any kind of writing. One interesting feature that appeared on a couple of them was a frequent word use list. It sorted all the words in your document from most to least used. It was a good way to see if you had a tendency to overuse certain words.

Some had great outlining and organization functions, letting you create a hierarchical structure like the document map I explained above. With additional functions to add notes to sections. So you could add a note to a particular scene, making a reminder for yourself to research hurricanes in Florida to improve the setting description. You could also add notes to each scene to make a note what the scene's purpose was, to help you ensure that the scene fits in and accomplishes certain goals.

For every good feature I found, there was an equally frustrating aspect to it. For example, some programs don't export to a word processor. I wanted one that would do that, so I could export the document to Word when I was ready to begin querying. Other programs don't have a spell check or grammar function. Sometimes those red and green squiggly lines drive me nuts, but I have come to appreciate and rely on their help.

My solution:
Finally, I have found a program that meets nearly every requirement I had. It's called Scrivener. But, the bad news for you PC folks is that this is a program designed for Macs. One program I had tried and liked was yWriter - and it's free! But I can't recall why I didn't keep using it. If I remember, I'll add it to the comments.

But here are a few reasons why Scrivener is working well for me (and hopefully that will help any of you determine what to look for in writing programs, should you want to use one). I like the way I can break down data. I have a main file called "draft 1." Under that, I have a separate file for each chapter. I like being able to start a new document of sorts for each chapter. It gives me a larger sense of accomplishment when I see more and more files appear. Under "draft 1" I have a folder called "other files." Within that I have my plot document, character information, and more. That way if I give a name to a minor secondary character that I need to refer to later, rather than endless scrolling and searching, or even opening another document to my already cluttered computer - I can simply click on that file's title within the same program. I also have a second file called "research" where I've added bits of research I've found.

There are also a couple of viewing options. You can open up the "corkboard." Visually, it adds an index card to a corkboard for every file you have. On that index card you can make notes. So If I know the purpose of chapter 5 is to introduce the external conflict that will keep the hero and heroine apart, I can make a short note. Then I can review the index cards to look at the main points of my book, and how it is progressing.

The BEST feature I've used so far is the full screen mode. I have written so much more using this mode over the past week. It's just as it sounds - you can make the document full screen so you can't be distracted by the internet, e-mail programs, chat programs, etc. But if you don't want to be fully cut-off, or if you're waiting for an e-mail, you can make the background of the full-screen a bit transparent. So if you leave your e-mail program open behind it, you can see when new e-mails come in. How cool is that? I set it to zero transparency so I didn't get distracted at all.

There are a lot of other features I haven't yet explored on my 30-day free trial. Ones like keywords. I'll definitely purchase this program when my trial is up.

Here is a screen shot I pulled from Google images. I'll describe what the parts are, in relation to what I've mentioned above


















Along the left you can see the heirarchical outline where I use "draft 1" then the chapter numbers under that. The middle section shows you both the corkboard feature, and the main writing screen. The right column shows options for adding labels to things and a synopsis feature - which I'm guessing is the text from the index card. But I don't know for sure. These are functions I haven't yet explored.

I'm really excited to use this for my thesis. I have made a file called "draft 1." Under that I have a subfile (like chapters of a book) for the various sections of my paper. I then have a second file called "sources." Within that, I will make subfiles for each source and the notes. That way I can quickly refer to it in one location for pull data.

If you are interested in trying a writing program, but aren't sure where to begin - I suggest you join RWA's technology listserv. It will save you time from endless Google searches. People have already talked about the good, bad and ugly of these programs, plus a few blog and Web site posts that talk about several in one location. So check that out and search previous messages for those conversations.

Have any of you used a writing program before? Do you think it's more than you need, or would it help you organize your thoughts?

9 comments:

Paty Jager said...

Lisa, I'm glad this is working for you, but seriously, I'd be too confused by all that stuff to get any writing done! LOL I like the map document. I have all my chapters on it and can skip from chapter to chapter. That's all I need. As for opening the other documents, I open them, read what I need, and then click the minus sign which puts them at the bottom of my screen to open whenever I want or need them again.

So I won't be looking for any writing software in the near future, but I'm glad you found something that works for you!

Alice Sharpe said...

As soon as I shake my head, uncross my eyes and close my mouth, I'll comment. Whew... there.

Yikes, kudos to you for your intellectual search for the perfect program. I tend to make do rather than relearn, so I am sincere when I offer my admiration.

Still, I guess I have to agree with Paty, I would get very confused with all those options. I use Word, and I don't know if it's because i've been doing this for twenty years or because I tend to write a book in one fell swoop (a long swoop, to be sure, but seldom with huge lapses once it's contracted), but I seldom get lost within my document. I go back and change things constantly but hardly ever scroll. If I can't remember a character name, for instance, I usually can remember an unusual word (for the manuscript) I used to describe them. So I do the F7 hunt for "professor" or "pink" or "mustache" and it takes me to the character. If there's something I want to research later, I usually just hit the color key and make the word red to jog my memory, although as absent minded as I am about almost everything in my life, I'm not when I'm working on a book, at least when it comes to the book, that is.

As for the scenes and other breakdowns you analytical types do, I don't do them or if I do, I do them in my head where they won't bother anyone.

I'm excited for you that you have finally found a program that will give you what you want both for fiction and non-fiction writing. That obscure the screen thing is a very cool feature -- I can see how that would come in handy. The allure of the little red dot by email is terribly hard to resist for me, too.

Neat blog!

Lisa Leoni said...

Hahahaha! Well I guess that goes to show what makes life easier for one person makes it much more frustrating for another. I'm very glad I found this program, it's already helped with my thesis and I've written more in the past week than the previous month.

Thank you both for your comments!

Kendra said...

I've heard many Mac users say good things about Scrivener. Only once have I tried different writing software. I was so freaked by the odd layout I immediately removed it without writing a word.

I'll check out the document map on Word. I didn't know about that. I have the feeling I'm aware of only 5% of the tools avail on Word.

Deborah Wright said...

Scrivener, FTW! :-)

I've been using Scrivener since I bought my first Mac in Dec 2007. I love this software! Not only does it do all the things you described, but there's a "novel" template so that once you're done with your draft, Scrivener knows how to print it out in proper format. It also exports to Word format for the final version (Scrivener is supposed to be about drafts) -- especially handy for electronic submissions (and keeping me from running screaming at the thought of having to create in Word).

I can't say enough good things about Scrivener. Like you, Lisa, I love the full screen format. And it doesn't hurt that it's only $39.95.

By the way, when I posted about writing software awhile back, someone asked me why I hate Word so much. I've been trying to figure that out, since Word has improved over the years. Part of my reaction is to how...big and clunky and overpriced it still is (as is just about all M$FT software). Part of it has to do with having worked with Adobe desktop publishing software called Framemaker years ago, which did everything, including allowing you to create chapters within books and link books, etc., etc., years before Word did much more than format fonts and crash. I found it hard to be impressed with Word after that. So, I think my knee-jerk reaction to Word really is a learned behavior. ;-)

Alice Sharpe said...

Debbie, you said, "... there's a "novel" template so that once you're done with your draft, Scrivener knows how to print it out in proper format. It also exports to Word format for the final version (Scrivener is supposed to be about drafts) -- especially handy for electronic submissions..."

Now, that makes me curious. I may have to try this. Ack, something new! Taking a deep breath....

Lisa Hendrix said...

I tried Scrivener and liked some aspects of it, but when I ported my finished proposal over to Word and sent it to my editor, I later discovered a TON of mistakes/typos. Some of them were, I think, things I hadn't seen due to the unfamiliar screen format. But there were many, many cases that I specifically remembered fixing; apparently the ms had gone back to some earlier, unproofed version! I never figured out what had happened, but I had to apologize to my editor and tell her to dump the version I'd sent her, then edit the Word version and resend.

Since then, I have used Scrivener for storyboarding and prewriting, but anything that's going to go out the door is done in Pages, then saved to Word format.

Berkley has now gone to purely e-editing, even for copy edits and final galleys, so I just got a copy of Office 2008 for Mac. I understand there are some new features, so I'll be checking them out. I haven't tried document mapping since the mid-90s when Word screwed up a mapped file so badly I had to go in and take it apart by hand and reconstruct it.

Elisabeth Naughton said...

My head is spinning.

I'm very linear, so document map in word suits me just fine. And I always know where to find things in my novel because I'm constantly going through it.

The problem with new software (for me) is the time it takes to learn how to use it. That's time that takes away from my writing.

I'm glad this program is working for you though, Lisa! Hopefully you'll have that full finished before you know it!

Genene Valleau, writing as Genie Gabriel said...

Hi, Lisa!

The thought of writing software sounds interesting but, as Eli mentioned, the time to learn it would take away from actually getting things done. So it will have to stay on my list of things to do someday. In the meantime, I still have my easel-sized pages on the wall!