
Stop rolling your eyes; this isn’t what you think it is. I’m not preaching historical research.

Stop rolling your eyes; this isn’t what you think it is. I’m not preaching historical research.
last year's bestseller, Shiver. Fans of these connected books will be pleased to know that several favorite characters are returning. Lisa's latest news release provided this blurb of the book: Second Novel
Third Novel
Fourth Novel
Am I the only freak that does this or do any of you do this, too? (Ha Ha)
Yes, we all have them. Some people more than others. :) People with multiple flaws - do you find them interesting or over the top?
What I’m getting at is- Do both your main characters have to be flawed or tortured to make a reader want to read about them? Can one character be “normal”? Okay maybe their flaw is too virtuous. :) Lately all I’ve heard about is having a character with flaws so he can be redeemed. But is that really what makes or breaks a book?
Can you have one main character without a flaw or tortured past and still make them interesting?
Janet Burroway author of “Writing Fiction” states: “…characters should be round rather than flat.” “A round character is many faceted and is capable of change.”
Do you want to read about a heroine who is grieving over the death of a younger sibling, her parent’s divorce, and her last boyfriend’s infidelity? She has issues and then some! There are many people in real life with this much going on – but is it necessary to pile it on characters to make them sympathetic? Is giving her all of these past problems overkill? Wouldn’t you, even as you sympathize with her, root for the “normal” hero who is trying to cope with loving this person and helping her work through all this baggage?
Dwight V. Swain in “The Techniques of a Selling Writer” asks the question, “How do you make a character fascinate a reader?” His answer is a couple pages long, but this is what caught my interest- “You shackle him(reader) to the character with chains of envy. You make the character someone who does what the reader would like to do, yet can’t.” And he goes on to list the items most people envy: Courage, Imagination, and attaining the unattainable.
These attributes reflect the heroine in the last two books I read. She’s a cat-burglar, kind of like a female McGyver and she’s trying to go straight for the man in her life. I plan to read every book I can about this character. I like her spunk and wit. Oops! That’s coming up!
Donald Maas in “Writing the Breakout Novel” says this about what makes a character larger than life. “Strength- what makes characters broadly appealing is not their weaknesses but their strengths, not their defeats, but their triumphs.” Also “Inner Conflict – struggling to attain the impossible.” And “Self-Regard – Their emotions matter to them…. They embrace life.” And last but not least “Wit and Spontaneity – They do and say things ordinary people would not.” He also adds there are two character qualities “that leave a deeper more lasting impression of a character than any other: Forgiveness and self-sacrifice.”
I’m reading a series where the hero is “normal” well he’s a billionaire, but aside from that, he really doesn’t have any flaws. (I’d fall in bed with him any time) He is trying to help the woman he loves (the cat-burglar above) to go straight. He is forgiving her past and puts losing lots of money on the line to help her (self-sacrifice). I like his solidness and his being there for the heroine no matter what. As yet, (two books) I haven't found a single flaw in him, but he's one of the drooliest heroes I've ever read!
The hero in my current WIP is like that. He knows he wants the heroine. And he is willing to go to the ends of the earth to help her realize she wants and needs him too. He doesn’t have a tortured past. He has a past of loss which relates to the heroine and he has a need for answers, just as she does. But he doesn’t have any flaws – again – I’d fall in bed with him any time! LOL
I hear writers/readers say they love tortured/flawed heroes because they like to see them redeemed. I guess if we all liked the same type of hero, we’d all be writing the same kind of book and they would eventually get boring.
Anyway, do you like flawed/tortured characters or can there be a “
Or maybe it's supposed to be the Tenth Circle of Hell. I forget. Been a long time since I read Dante.I was writing along splendidly on the WIP and BAM, my heroine said something that stopped me cold. Could that have happened? She said she remembered riding a train as a child. Why did she say this? I don't know. But now that she did, I have to pull out my over-sized book on the history of North American trains to see where trains ran when she was a child. And then do these dates and areas work with the time line I had already set up?
I didn't get a chance to respond to Wavy's post yesterday, but I did read it and I have to say, shoot girls, you're all making me teary-eyed! I nearly cried after reading Jen's post about her brother, then after reading Wavy's I-love-my-RWA-group post yesterday as well. If I didn't know any better I'd say I'm hormonal. So if any of you are like me, fear not, I'm sparing you the tears today. However, I am going to post a little about something that's been on my mind since Tuesday's meeting.
Have you noticed when you are around a very small child and you are both drawing, that the child doesn't care that you can draw a superior cat? A more life-like horse? A person with a single nose and two hands with fingers? Your average three year old just keeps drawing their own stick figure or colors over yours with a purple crayon.