Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Choosing Your Battles

You get me two days in a row …

The other day I was writing a car chase scene with shots fired.

Now, I cannot begin to tell you how many times this very thing has happened to my husband and myself. There we are minding our own business when suddenly someone starts trying to run us off the road or fires bullets at us. I, of course, take the fully loaded revolver from the glove box and shoot back as the DH steers. Or I unlock the shotgun under the seat, rest it against the door frame and BLAST.

Okay, so it's never happened and yet here I am writing about it. Since it has never happened to me or anyone else I know (except, perhaps, Becky--maybe this is where she gets her loathing of all things icky, scary or violent!) where am I supposed to get the images that feed my eager little fingers? Yep, movies and television.

So, after I write the scene--which feels a little light weight to me--I make my way downstairs to cook dinner and actually stand for awhile (Yay!) and while puttering around, I turn on the television. They are running M*A*S*H reruns right now and I like them. The one that happened to be on that night was one where some of the characters make their way to the front. The FRONT, as in the line where the good guys and the bad guys do their best to blow each other up.

On the way back from the FRONT, bombs start falling around their Jeep. They dodge this explosion and that one until they leave the Jeep and take cover in a handy bunker.

A light bulb came on in my pea sized brain. I HAD AN EPIPHANY!

I turned to my husband and said, "So, which film better depicts the accuracy of a battle, Saving Private Ryan or MASH." He looks at me like I'm nuts and says, "Saving Private Ryan, of course." And I said, "Exactly. And it just dawned on me that I am writing MASH."

I know I'm not really writing MASH. What I'm trying to say is that I am depicting a gunfight or battle my characters are engaged in a sort of short-hand type manner. I am appealing to my audience who have grown up in the same culture I have grown up in, to call upon the images they have unwittingly stowed in their minds (just as I have) to follow my car chase and fill in some of the blanks because I am writing romance, i.e., I am writing about the characters, not the step by step dynamics of a car chase.

Currently, I am reading a police procedural series. The characters in this series investigate crime in a very methodical manner I imagine my police officer son would recognize. I like it, but I am more interested in why this character did this, why that characters said that, and are those two every going to realize they are meant for each other than I am the trajectory of every bullet.

There are many decisions to be made while writing and making poor choices throws the reader out of the book. If you are writing about horses and mention them chewing their cuds, almost any reader is going to throw your book against a wall and shout, "That's a cow, you moron!" You need to get the details right, but you also need to advance your story in a compelling way. That's one of many balancing acts we perform.

I think some of writing these kinds of scenes is instinct. We "see" the battle, for instance, in our head. We press down on the accelerator pedal. We hear the tires spinning. We see jouncing headlights as the car in pursuit hits a bumpy spot. We feel the heavy gun in our hand and the anxiety and fear that pushes its way up our throat. We imagine all this and report it as well as we can.

Or we come across a body. How many bodies have my characters found during the course of the past umpteen books? Many. How many have I found? Zip. I've seen dead people, but only those than died peacefully or once, in a bizarre visit to the morgue with my soon to be newspaper reporter daughter-in-law, those that died less peacefully but had already been cleaned up and sanitized. Of course, like millions of Americans, I am no stranger to violent death courtesy of film. So, again, I have images. And again, I choose which images to use with each incident.

And it changes from time to time depending on how important the character is to the plot, how important the means of death is, from whose perspective I use (a former cop is going to see things differently than a small child or an old lady and that goes back to individual perspective, a subject that fascinates me.)

Whether you write romantic suspense, mystery or straight romance, historicals, paranormal or YA, you are making heavy-weight decisions about what you show a dozen times a book, maybe a dozen times a page. And you are deciding at what level you are going to take realism. I guess I'm finally growing a little more comfortable with the fact that it's okay to use your imagination and depart from literal truth or from reporting every detail in order to make your action scenes come to life, trusting that your reader will travel with you and maybe even fill in a few of the blanks.

What decisions do you struggle with? Is it always instinct that guides your choices about how to best "shoot" a scene (like a film director might set up camera angles, wait for the right light, call in hair and make-up to make sure everyone in the scene is just right?) Any hints? Any troubles? And like me, do some of you who have been doing this for awhile find that it gets more complicated as time passes? And is that because we are willing to entertain more options or because we're getting (saying it ain't so) dumber?

I'm on the fence with that last one!

8 comments:

Elisabeth Naughton said...

GREAT blog, Alice, and very timely for me.

My agent and I have been bouncing ideas back and forth regarding a proposal I just sent her. She felt I needed more tension, that I'd "skimmed" over the (yes, here it is) car chase and left too many holes. I suppose she's right. This is RS after all, and I was pushing to get to the "destination" so my main characters could have it out too fast. Today I'm headed back to add in that car chase. Wish me luck. ;)

Anonymous said...

Elisabeth--Good Luck!

Car chases are hard for me because they don't fascinate me and every thing that happens in them happens from the outside, so to say and has little to do with dialogue, etc...

Alice

P.S. Blogger still doesn't like my password!

Paty Jager said...

It's kind of like shootouts in a western. I prefer a sound thrashing with fists over bullets flying. There is something impersonal about bullets, yet knuckles meeting flesh and blood splattering, feels more in the moment and personal. LOL

I like your analogy of Mash and Private Ryan!

If I am in one POV heading into a battle (guns, fists, bows& arrows, fangs and claws)That's who's POV I stay in and make it be integral to the plot. As for how much or how little - it all depends on the scene, the story, the plot. I'm a panster and I just put it on paper. If I get stuck, something isn't right, I rework it and maybe change
the POV going into the scene or shift if it needs to be shared through someone else's POV.

Great blog!

Anonymous said...

Yeah, Paty, I agree with staying in a POV of one character.

Where I get bogged down anymore is deciding whose POV it should be. The hero or heroine? The bad guy? Should we watch it happen or should we come across it after it happens? Who should then find it?

Actually, this list goes on and on but I'm running late and no one wants to listen to me muse about this stuff anyway!

Good to have you home.

Alice

Karen Duvall said...

Hey, Alice, great blog! I love writing action scenes, not that they always turn out just right. I too often over-explain what happens and have to go back in and tighten things up. It's one of my (many) writing weaknesses.

Though I've never witnessed a shootout or been involved in one, I think I have a fair visceral understanding of how it might be, though obviously understated. Terror, fear, adrenalin rush, panic... I've experienced all those in other contexts so it's just matching that up with the mechanics of how it might go down in a fight or car chase (yes, that would be the over-explaining part. Sigh.).

I own a fascinating book that I bought from Palladin Press called "Lead Poisoning: True Stories From The Wrong End Of A Gun." It's really helped me get a feel for what a character might experience under similar circumstances.

Karen

Anonymous said...

Karen--I need that book...

Alice

Danita Cahill said...

Heck no, Alice, you're not getting dumber. Just look at the company you're keeping these days....us.
Ha!

When I write the suspense scenes, I try to prolong the action, give lots of details and give a blow by blow account in as punchy a way as I can. Because I write with humor as well, my heroines tend to get nervous/silly/think funny thoughts during the tiems of great suspense, so, if my plan is working right, there is some comic relief at the perfect moments...

The hard part, at least it used to be, is not pulling back the punches, but letting the axe/bullets/speeding car fall where it will, even if it means injury/anxiety/stress for the characters. Especially if it means injury/anxiety/stress for the characters. Like Eli, I like to torture them. And like Karen said chase your characters up a tree and throw rocks at them.

Anonymous said...

Danita--You are right, I'm not getting dumber, I'm just keeping smarter company. Damn.

Alice